Skip to content
  • There are no suggestions because the search field is empty.
The Learning Forum · CLO LIFT

The Field Has the
Tools.
It's Missing the
Standards.

CLO LIFT is a practitioner-driven initiative to address L&D's most persistent structural problems — not with new platforms, but with clearer thinking, shared language, and accountability.

50+
Years of L&D innovation — yet foundational problems persist
7
Core challenge areas being addressed by senior practitioners
0
Commercial products. Practitioner-led, non-commercial, non-negotiable.

Fifty Years of Innovation. The Same Core Problems.


The most important challenges in L&D are not implementation failures. They are structural — embedded in how the function defines success, organizes its work, and evaluates value. Fixing this requires more than better platforms or content.

01 How does learning secure time and credibility in organizations where every activity competes for limited attention?
02 How can skills development keep pace with business change rather than perpetually lag behind it?
03 What forms of governance help L&D align with strategy, accountability, and measurable outcomes?
04 What constitutes meaningful evidence of learning impact — beyond completions and sentiment scores?

Not Another Trend. A More Disciplined Path.


CLO LIFT was formed to create a serious practitioner space for addressing enduring issues collectively — not episodically, and not on an artificial trend cycle. Its purpose is to generate clearer thinking, stronger shared language, and more usable standards for practice.

I
Define Problems with Clarity

Naming persistent challenges precisely, with less reliance on fashionable language and more commitment to accuracy.

II
Define What “Good” Looks Like

Developing an explicit, shared standard for excellence in learning and leadership development across the field.

III
Build Practical Tools

Creating frameworks, articles, and instruments that practitioners can apply directly to improve real work inside organizations.

IV
Reclaim Thought Leadership

Shifting the agenda back to those accountable for results — away from vendors, analysts, and external commentators.

Seven Problems That Have Outlasted Every Wave of Innovation


Identified by senior practitioners across industries, these challenge areas represent recurring constraints on L&D effectiveness — not because they are newly discovered, but because they have remained structurally unresolved.

Challenge 01
Time to Learn

Securing organizational time and credibility for learning in environments where attention is finite and competing.

Challenge 02
Skills Acceleration

Upskilling at a speed equal to or greater than business and market pace — surging critical skills in compressed timeframes.

Challenge 03
Governance as Strategy

Structuring L&D decisions, funding, and accountability so that learning functions as a genuine business lever — not just a support activity.

Challenge 04
Performance Culture

Embedding continuous learning and adaptability into organizational values, overcoming resistance, and building psychological safety.

Challenge 05
Science of Learning to Learn

Understanding the meta-skill of learning itself — metacognition, cognitive barriers, and the mechanisms that make individuals more effective learners.

Challenge 06
The Evolving CLO Mandate

Defining the strategic role of the Chief Learning Officer as AI reshapes the relationship between work and learning.

Challenge 07
Outcomes-Based Measurement

Moving beyond completions and sentiment scores toward evidence of real capability change, transfer, and business contribution.

A Third Path — Beyond Hype and Cynicism


Too much discourse in L&D alternates between overstated promises and resigned critique. CLO LIFT operates from a different premise: that serious progress requires intellectual honesty, operational realism, and standards that survive contact with actual organizational life.

Practitioner-Driven, Not Vendor-Led Built by and for those accountable for results — with no commercial product attached.
Organizationally Realistic Acknowledges constraints rather than pretending they can be designed away.
Evidence-Oriented Prioritizes what the evidence actually shows over what is fashionable or convenient.
Constructive, Not Critical Builds durable frameworks and standards, not commentary. The goal is improvement — not insight for its own sake.

A serious profession needs a third path: disciplined, evidence-oriented, practitioner-built improvement. Not more shiny objects. Not more fashion. Better thinking, built with and by the people who actually have to make the work hold up.

CLO LIFT — The Learning Forum
Cross-Partner Collaboration
The Learning Forum Udemy Docebo Harvard Future Forward Institute

An Invitation to Serious Practitioners

For those who lead learning functions, shape talent strategy, or carry responsibility for development at scale — this is not another conversation for its own sake. It is the harder work of professionalization.